We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
The day began with the President and First Lady observing a moment of silence on the South Lawn.
At 9:30 the President delivered remarks at the Pentagon Memoriial:
9:34 A. M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen and members of the Armed Forces, fellow Americans, family and friends of those that we lost this day -- Michelle and I are deeply humbled to be with you.
Eight Septembers have come and gone. Nearly 3,000 days have passed -- almost one for each of those taken from us. But no turning of the seasons can diminish the pain and the loss of that day. No passage of time and no dark skies can ever dull the meaning of this moment.
So on this solemn day, at this sacred hour, once more we pause. Once more we pray -- as a nation and as a people; in city streets where our two towers were turned to ashes and dust; in a quiet field where a plane fell from the sky; and here, where a single stone of this building is still blackened by the fires.
We remember with reverence the lives we lost. We read their names. We press their photos to our hearts. And on this day that marks their death, we recall the beauty and meaning of their lives; men and women and children of every color and every creed, from across our nation and from more than 100 others. They were innocent. Harming no one, they went about their daily lives. Gone in a horrible instant, they now "dwell in the House of the Lord forever."
We honor all those who gave their lives so that others might live, and all the survivors who battled burns and wounds and helped each other rebuild their lives; men and women who gave life to that most simple of rules: I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper.
We pay tribute to the service of a new generation -- young Americans raised in a time of peace and plenty who saw their nation in its hour of need and said, "I choose to serve"; "I will do my part." And once more we grieve. For you and your families, no words can ease the ache of your heart. No deeds can fill the empty places in your homes. But on this day and all that follow, you may find solace in the memory of those you loved, and know that you have the unending support of the American people.
Scripture teaches us a hard truth. The mountains may fall and the earth may give way; the flesh and the heart may fail. But after all our suffering, God and grace will "restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast." So it is -- so it has been for these families. So it must be for our nation.
Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and who plot against us still. In defense of our nation we will never waver; in pursuit of al Qaeda and its extremist allies, we will never falter.
Let us renew our commitment to all those who serve in our defense -- our courageous men and women in uniform and their families and all those who protect us here at home. Mindful that the work of protecting America is never finished, we will do everything in our power to keep America safe.
Let us renew the true spirit of that day. Not the human capacity for evil, but the human capacity for good. Not the desire to destroy, but the impulse to save, and to serve, and to build. On this first National Day of Service and Remembrance, we can summon once more that ordinary goodness of America -- to serve our communities, to strengthen our country, and to better our world.
Most of all, on a day when others sought to sap our confidence, let us renew our common purpose. Let us remember how we came together as one nation, as one people, as Americans, united not only in our grief, but in our resolve to stand with one another, to stand up for the country we all love.
This may be the greatest lesson of this day, the strongest rebuke to those who attacked us, the highest tribute to those taken from us -- that such sense of purpose need not be a fleeting moment. It can be a lasting virtue.
For through their own lives –- and through you, the loved ones that they left behind –- the men and women who lost their lives eight years ago today leave a legacy that still shines brightly in the darkness, and that calls on all of us to be strong and firm and united. That is our calling today and in all the Septembers still to come.
May God bless you and comfort you. And may God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)
END 9:40 A. EDT
History of Democrat racism
The election of the deeply racist Democrat Woodrow Wilson (who had Southern roots) to the presidency in 1912 and re-election in 1916 led to a rise in Southern progressive Democrats who were internationalists/globalists.  They were opposed the isolationism and nationalism of many conservative Republicans, a fact that modern-day progressives have covered up to whitewash important details of U.S. history.
In late January 1937, southern senators Tom Connally, Richard Russell, Jr., Walter F. George, and Claude Pepper filibustered an anti-lynching bill to prevent it from passing in the Senate.    All four were pro-New Deal liberals/leftists Connally was a pro-Roosevelt New Dealer, Wilsonian progressive and globalist  Russell was mostly a New Dealer  George voted for a number of New Deal programs,  Pepper was regarded as a longtime champion of liberal causes throughout his political career. Even North Carolina Democrat senator Josiah Bailey, a member of the Conservative Coalition who co-wrote the Conservative Manifesto,  was a progressive and globalist.  Future president Lyndon Johnson was first elected to the United States House of Representatives from Texas' 10th congressional district as a liberal New Dealer and an ardent supporter of then-president Franklin D. Roosevelt.  Johnson had opposed every civil rights measure in his first two decades in Congress,   even anti-lynching legislation.  In his 1948 Senate campaign against governor Coke R. Stevenson in the primary, he asserted in a speech:
|I have voted AGAINST the so-called poll tax repeal bill the poll tax should be repealed by those states which enacted them. I have voted against the so-called anti-lynching bill the state can, and DOES, enforce the law against murder.|
Liberals often point to Lyndon B. Johnson's so-called advocacy for civil rights to push the myth of party switch. This was despite the fact that Johnson worked to water down the 1957 Civil Rights Act, weakening it down by removing the stringent voting protection clauses  in addition to adding a jury trial amendment,  which then-senator John F. Kennedy, joining segregationists at the urging of Johnson, voted for.  The latter was to ensure that little to no progress on civil rights would be made in the South, as the jury would almost certainly acquit the defendant.  Segregationist Florida senator George Smathers also helped Johnson's scheme. [Citation Needed] It was afterwards that the legislation was passed, in which Johnson then supported in the final Senate floor vote.  It was reported that the Texas Democrat had referred to the legislation as the "n***** bill". 
The myth of the parties "switching" is very inconsistent with actual U.S. history. The Republican Party only became much more right-wing during the 1910s, after Theodore Roosevelt and his Republican progressives at the time split with the Taft-supporting conservatives. The Democrat Party arguably (according to some) became much more left-wing during the 1930s during the New Deal coalition era. Progressives who brainwash youth in the modern-day education system, erase in history textbooks examples of certain racist liberals such as Hugo Black. They furthermore ignore the fact that many racist Democrats in the 30s were leftists who fervently supported the New Deal, [note 1] including Theodore Bilbo, Tom Connally, Claude Pepper, [note 2] Lister Hill, and John Sparkman. It should also be noted liberal Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt's support came strongest from the Deep South in his election/re-election victories.
Israel i Sverige[B]
Först kör Obama som om Iranavtalet var något han ville ta personlig gloria för, sen åsidosatte han Kongressen och rusade direkt till FN och Säkerhetsrådet för att ta bort alla varningar till Iran och låta dem köpa och sälja vapen som de vill, så inte konstigt Kongressen är rasande. Obama har 476 dagar kvar och kommer att försöka driva igenom vilka vansinnigheter som helst, om ingen stoppar kräket. DN skriver om Obamas privata påtvingande av sina åsikter på Säkerhetsrådet.
US lawmakers rail against ‘inappropriate’ UN vote on Iran deal
BY REBECCA SHIMONI STOIL July 20, 2015, 11:45 pm
Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee (center), the Foreign Relations Committee chairman, at a Washington news conference in March 2015 (Win McNamee/Getty Images via JTA)
WASHINGTON — A powerful US senator leading the charge against the nuclear deal with Iran decried the Obama administration’s decision Monday to endorse the deal at the United Nations before Congress had a chance to review the pact.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker said the move was “inappropriate” and “contrary to the spirit” of legislation recently signed into law by President Barack Obama.
As chair of the committee at the center of the 60-day Senate review of the deal, Corker will be leading the review hearings for the Senate, and his committee is expected to be the point of origin for a resolution of approval or disapproval of the Iran deal itself.
“The administration’s decision to endorse this agreement at the UN prior to a vote in Congress on behalf of the American people is contrary to the spirit of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, which was supported by overwhelming majorities of the House and Senate and signed by the president,” he said in a statement.
Earlier Monday, Obama welcomed the unanimous acceptance by the UN Security Council of a resolution supporting the deal recently struck between Iran and the P5+1 nations and paving the way for the removal of tough international sanctions against Tehran.
After the Security Council resolution passed by a vote of 15-0, Obama noted that “there is broad international consensus around this issue” and added that his “working assumption is that Congress will pay attention to that broad basic consensus.”
But Corker’s response indicated that it was not just that some members of Congress were skeptical about the deal itself, but were also angered by a perception that Obama was sidestepping the legislature — and the law.
“It is inappropriate to commit the United States to meet certain international obligations without even knowing if Congress and the American people approve or disapprove of the Iran agreement,” Corker wrote in his Monday statement.
“During the review period, members on both sides of the aisle will evaluate the agreement carefully, press the administration for answers and then vote their conscience.”
Corker authored the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, which allows Congress the option of voting a vote of approval or disapproval of the deal reached last week with Tehran.
Under the law, Congress has 60 days to review the agreement and vote, but the president can veto a vote of disapproval that fails to garner the support of two-thirds of the Senate.
While it is not clear how many Democratic legislators are considering voting against the agreement itself, some have already questioned the president’s quick turn to the UN before the Congressional review period concludes.
In a bipartisan show of concern, Representative Ed Royce, Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Representative Eliot Engel, a Democrat and the committee’s ranking member, issued a joint bipartisan statement saying that the two were “disappointed” about the passage of the United Nations Security Council resolution.
“We are disappointed that the UN Security Council passed a resolution on Iran this morning before Congress was able to fully review and act on this agreement,” the two wrote. “We are also greatly concerned that the resolution lifts restrictions on Iran’s ballistic missiles in eight years and conventional arms in five years. Regardless of this morning’s outcome, Congress will continue to play its role.”
On Thursday, Democratic Senator Ben Cardin joined Corker in urging Obama to postpone the Security Council vote until Congress had the opportunity to review the agreement.
In a letter to the president, both senators wrote that they were “deeply concerned that your administration plans to enable the United Nations Security Council to vote on the agreement before the United States Congress can do the same,” wrote the senators. “Doing so would be contrary to your statement that ‘it’s important for the American people and Congress to get a full opportunity to review this deal… our national security policies are stronger and more effective when they are subject to the scrutiny and transparency that democracy demands.”
The letter won the support of House Democratic whip Steny Hoyer, who said that he believes “that waiting to go to the United Nations until such time as Congress has acted would be consistent with the intent and substance of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.”
Hoyer is Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s right-hand man and his concern over the UN process was striking, given Pelosi’s own quick support for the deal itself.
Inga kommentarer :
Skicka en kommentar
Tack för kommentar - jag godkänner när jag har läst den! Om den är värd att godkännas :)
What do you think will happen tomorrow?
Someone asked me that at Rotary today, and I say that in the presidential contest (which is what the question was about), if you force me to pick a winner, I say it will be President Obama. In the Electoral College at least. Although it’s close enough that I could be wrong, at this point I think we’re where we were months ago: A slight edge for the incumbent.
As more than one poll has indicated, I’m with most Americans in making that prediction. The latest one I’ve seen shows that 55 percent of the electorate thinks Obama will win, and only 35 percent thinks Mitt Romney will.
Here’s the boiled-down-to-essentials way Nate Silver over at FiveThirtyEight put it several days ago:
Mr. Obama is leading in the polls of Ohio and other states that would suffice for him to win 270 electoral votes, and by a margin that has historically translated into victory a fairly high percentage of the time.
Over the weekend, Silver noted that various polls also show a slight Obama advantage in the popular vote, but generally within the margin of error.
Heading into Election Day, likely voters divide 50 percent for President Obama and 47 percent for his challenger, Republican Mitt Romney, according to the latest, final weekend release of the Washington Post-ABC News tracking poll.
A nail-biter throughout, the presidential contest remains closely competitive through its last days, even as most voters perceive a likely win for the president.
In regular polls since early July, neither candidate ever gathered more than 50 percent of likely voters, and neither ever slipped below 46 percent. Across nearly 7,000 interviews with likely voters from Oct. 18 through Sunday evening, less than four-tenths of a percentage point separates Obama and Romney.
The difference between the candidates in the final weekend tally is right at the 2.5 percentage margin of sampling error for the final four-night sample of 2,345 likely voters. This makes Obama’s being at plus three points over Romney an edge only by the slimmest of margins, well below conventional measures of statistical significance…
DHS Waives Antiquated Law Slowing Recovery From Colonial Pipeline Shutdown
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Hundreds of protesters gathered outside the Orange County (OC) Board of Supervisors meeting on May 11 to protest against digital proof of vaccination, i.e., vaccine passports, after county officials added it to their vaccination app a few weeks ago without explanation.
The passport is being promoted by the OC Health Agency as a way for businesses to allow or restrict patrons from receiving goods and services based on whether or not they have been vaccinated.
According to Orange County Register, the county had planned to give anyone who received vaccines at sites run by the OC Health Care Agency the choice to get an electronic QR code they could keep in their smartphone and show if requested to get into a business or entertainment venue.
County officials had already approved changes to a contract with the creator of the Othena vaccine-scheduling app that would allow the addition of digital vaccine records. County CEO Frank Kim said he won’t move forward unless the Board of Supervisors specifically directs him to. The discussion on the app’s enhancement with a “Proof of Vaccination” option was on the Board’s May 11 meeting agenda.
OC officials have said repeatedly they are not requiring, and don’t plan to require, that anyone get vaccinated, or show proof that they have been vaccinated, to receive county services. State and federal officials also have said they don’t plan to mandate a vaccine passport system.
At the same time, according to the state reopening guidelines, California does allow large venues such as stadiums and convention centers to admit more people if they are tested for COVID or show proof of vaccination, de-facto creating an incentive for businesses to require a proof of vaccination.
“Of course, it is a form of a vaccine passport,” said Dr. John Swartzberg, a UC-Berkeley infectious-disease expert. That California has not embraced the label is not surprising, he said.
As reported by KABC, the protests in OC spilled inside the building where the Board of Supervisors was meeting, with more than 700 people signing up to speak during the board meeting.
“This is against the law. It would strip us of our privacy rights,” said one of the speakers.
“You are not going to brand us with a barcode like we are cattle. The Nazis looked like they were winning, too, for a little while,” said another.
From business owners to lawyers to everyday residents, the list of speakers went on for hours.
“Being that I am a Black American, and you’re asking me now to carry ‘freedom papers’ is absolutely appalling. I will bring every Black member of this community back down here if this goes any further,” said a speaker.
“This isn’t communist Russia, this isn’t communist China, this isn’t Nazi Germany. We should have the freedom. The Jews had passports, look what that led to,” said another.
Many speakers said they were concerned over establishing any sort of digital vaccine-verification method would lead to mandated vaccinations, infringe on personal privacy, enable tracking capabilities and lead to discrimination based on medical information. People also urged the board to ban private businesses from requesting proof of vaccination, calling the practice unconstitutional.
Many residents wanted county supervisors to ban businesses from requiring proof of vaccinations at Tuesday’s meeting.
Katrina Foley, one supervisor who stands firm in favor of a vaccine passport, believes most people support it and that only a small faction of people oppose it.
“These individuals are mostly people who don’t believe in vaccinating in the first place. They’re also people who in the past year have denied that COVID exists, denied the pandemic,” Foley argues. She went even further and added that these are “the same individuals” who “have marched on our United States Capitol, participated in the insurrection.” In other words, who else but extremists would reject electronic proof of the unapproved, experimental genetic injection?
Providing a digital record to people who opt in “is just a professional courtesy to businesses,” Foley said. She encouraged anyone worried that vaccine records would be used to track their activities “should throw away their iPhones and get off Facebook.”
However, in response to the public outcry, the board ended up voting 4-1 to “pause” a plan to offer a digital vaccination record.
The “noise” over the topic “has now reached a point where there is more harm than good that comes from it,” Chairman Andrew Do said before proposing to pause the QR code development.
The supervisors said they plan to revisit funding at a July 27 meeting.
Imagine my surprise today to find at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building that our Prime Minister Birdie Obama was quoting little ole me (little Spanish lingo as Obama is in Mexico) concerning the need for America to produce a high speed rail system.
It is disappointing in as I had no idea I had been nominated and accepted to be Sec. of Transportation. I would have liked to have been at least grilled by the hottie gun Senator of New York and had Stephie Herseth wear her big boob pink sweater she puts on in special occasions to inflate her breasts to D cup, all stand up in support of me.
Yet, I apparently swept through hearings so fast that I never even got my paycheck for being Sec. of Transportation, my office, my teapot and my room for a pony as every government official should have a pony to ride through the corridors of where they serve.
I'm quite certain that I have not met Birdie though as that I would have recalled, especially I would not have allowed him to muck up my transportation bullet train centerpiece which would have transformed the United States into an efficient, high paid, technology leading and high production nation.
See that is the problem with Birdie. He don't know squat about economics, trains nor how to lead a nation. He is putting peanuts into my bullet train project without the benefit if enlisting as I have told that idiot Mitt Romney and probably John McCain too. (special note to agree with Obama, Mitt Romney and Bob Jindal telling Cheney to lay off Obama, both of you boys take a powder in carrying Obama's water as the adults are moving in this situation that God is fixing. Either get on board with Americans or take the pansy room and learn flower drying.)
So Obama touching my bullet train plan of economic growth will only bring it to failure as is probably what this guy is up to. See Obama is not serious about stimulating the economy, because his stimulus is all about bribery to Democratic donors years from now to funnel money back into his campaign.
A real leader in the White House would have assembled Ford, GM, Boeing, the airlines, US Steel, Alcoa, General Electric, the California defense corporations and New York finance and cut them all in on an investment pie in building this high speed railway system which would be cut underground on the interstate system which already has right of way and employed multi millions of Americans in the finest of jobs.
As America was building this system, it would contract the technology and leadership around the world making trillions building a world system to improve people's lives and yes, to save energy.
I have laid this out before in detail, so will not go into the fine print, but just wanted to share my surprise at being Sec. of Transportation. I think I was asking to be Vice Regent of New Mexico or something like that with other perks, but I do not recall as I type a great deal of satire here with fact.
The main point being is Obama has taken my pristine plan and turned it into a cheap joy ride which is not going to be effect and a system destined for failure. Understand I'm an engineer of the old school who builds things to take 100 times the stress they think "might" ever happen, just to keep catastrophes from happening.
Build a bullet train above ground and it will sooner than later hit some eagle which will kill a host of people as 20 pounds of bird moving at 200 miles per hour kills loads of humans. Build bullet train underground in a tunnel and 500 mph speeds are possible in a completely controlled and safe environment without any problems.
As it appears Axelrod Inc. is paying close attention this . what was it Noel the coward Sheppard termed this blog. "arrogant". I don't see the coward influencing anyone, but I digress.
Perhaps Obama will take the advice and arrest hisself and Geithner, but then as Birdie blew his wad on the bullet train with too little and will make it late, I guess in that he would probably just up on handcuffs, call up some swarthy chic from overseas on a 900 number and have her tell him what a naughty poooooodle he is, or, water dog.
That is the problem with Obama the pirate. He has if he would just follow Jesus and what solutions God moves this blog to post, become the greatest of American leaders, but he is incapable of getting it right.
I guess people can now address me as Mr. Secretary. nopers, let's just leave it as servant as I prefer that.
Actually would prefer doing this bullet train deal correctly for my children in America to prosper them and I like being called servant of the Lord.
With that Mr. Secretary concludes his business day.
In Jesus Name We Trust
Ever since Barack Obama was in Europe and declared that America was not a Christian nation, I have been upset by the chorus of fools who voted for Obama and other ignorants chiming in with the same nonsense.
I heard one "christian" who voted for Obama declare that America was not Christian and the Founders set it up that way.
If one bothers to actually read the charters and compacts of the Pilgrims and Jamestown, one finds the reason they came to America was the same vision which led Christopher Columbus (another Christian who is under attack now in this "hate the white people era of Obama.), and that was these first settlers were here to evangelize the Indian peoples.
Yes in those early documents they were most concerned about the Gospel of Jesus the Christ, saving these people from eternal death and in risking their own lives were intent on saving several million immigrants from Japan, Europe and the Middle East known as Indians.
That makes North America, Latin America and South America all Christian founded nations. For the Obama voters, that means that makes the United States by historical documents in early Constitutions a literal Christian nation.
The Founders all believed in Jesus the Christ and the only reason they used poetic discourse in endowed by their Creator was to not to start a feud as some people called him Yahweh, Jehovah or Jesus, just like they do today and out of deference to not using the Name of God.
The Founders referred literally to the United States as the New Israel and New Jerusalem was often found in literature. We know now that through scientific study of language, immigration and genetic traits that the people who founded America were a sifted people as the Bible predicted of Joseph. America is in the Bible, because God long ago put His Name on these people.
All of these French Huguenots, Dutch Pilgrims, English Shakers, German Quakers etc. were all Jesus bearing children of God in His Name.
The Pastors who came over the Appalachians to the Jesuits who founded a host of colleges and cities under French control were all bearing Jesus Name and doing the work in His Name. In America, the Pastors were unique in they used their fists to convert bullies in the frontier and could be found shooting empire soldiers along with the Rangers, to hanging criminals. The Pastors in Jesus Name founded the entire United States upon which that people stands.
So Obama and those people chirping in are ignorant at least and at worst blasphemous fools as America IS and always was and always will be a Christian nation, because God marked Americans in His Name long ago in Covenant and continues to reaffirm that Covenant daily.
This is the problem for these fools in the Beings of the Elohim take this all very seriously in Their Name. Elohim, being the Hebrew of a Loving Living more than one God in character Who is One.
Christians know Them as the Father, the Son Jesus and the Holy Ghost.
That is why I was smiling when I saw that Barack Obama mandated that the Name of Christ be covered up when he went to Georgetown University with the Catholic leadership there complying. I smiled, because while I become upset for the grief it will cause Americans caught in the demonic crossfire when Obama denies on an international platform America is not a Christian nation, I know that God notes all of these things with deep interest and when a Catholic university starts covering up Jesus Name, because Obama with his demonic monkey in his pants demanded it. God's Chief Angel in the Word of God, Chief Operating Authority of God, in Jesus the Christ will in God's will judge thee events transpiring for which there is no remedy.
Jesus has just been slapped several times by Barack Hussein Obama and his supporters and Jesus will avenge His Name. That is why I'm smiling, because once activated, Jesus does not stop.
There are all sorts of judgments which can come. Those grinning fools in the military who thronged to Obama might be weeded out. It might be New York City weeded out. It might be Catholics being weeded. It does not matter really, because these people have been marked who chose Saul and now Saul will face Jesus wrath just like in Israel, along with the Americans attached to Obama.
So this person is not upset any more as I know God and God is not going to allow this to stand. Utter ruin were the words which this blog posted before concerning Obama and when Jesus defends His Name, I pray come Lord Jesus, come swiftly and balance the scales with a universe of weight on Your Name's balance compared to the floofiness of the Obama ilk.
I believe Obama has been given over to what he is. It is like the Prophet Micaiah, informing Ahab of the scene in heaven in a lying spirit came forth to entice Ahab's prophets and Ahab to his certain end. Obama just did not nor did these faux Catholics at Georgetown just "happen" to be blasphemous to Jesus Name. There is heavenly order in this, a lying spirit and God's judgement is being worked out.
So I rejoice in my Lord, Savior and Master working this out as I just post what He tells me by Their Spirit and it plays out better than a FOX series as the Holy Spirit is pointing things out to me in Their movements.
Catholics had better get their leadership reigned in as the Revelation of Jesus Christ given to St. John predicts the faithful there are going to be betrayed by their leadership when the anti christ comes onto the scene.
Barack Obama is the precursor of "change" and the Catholics are a bit too practiced in riding the government beast as their being the whore of Babylon.
It is all one more step, one more day and one more moment to the Last Trump in Jesus return. So I appreciate the real Americans being stirred up in vexing the Obama ilk, because they are working God's purposes and Obama is being handed over to the wrath that he and his followers are sentenced too.
I have no idea what that is and I hopefully would not be ordered by God to post that end as I do not need the hassle from it. (The hassle is it takes a great deal of energy to deal with God's messages in posting them. I do not fear the government nor the globalist ilk as I'm secure in God. They have more problems than they know what to do with and they have no idea how to get out as they are sealed for judgment.)
So glory to God in the highest. His completion and standing will for His Name to all mankind. In Jesus Name. Amen.
Come quickly Lord Jesus, avenge Your Holy Name. Amen
I Kings 22:22 , "And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And He said, thou shalt persude him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so."
Israel i Sverige[B]
If America had a real leader, the Islamic State (ISIS) would already be wiped off the map.
But we don’t. And as Yousef al-Salfi, an ISIS leader in Pakistan just admitted during interrogation, ISIS is being FUNDED by the Obama administration! What an incredible story, as it confirms our worst fears.
Salafi told the Pakistani government that America paid $600 per terrorist recruit if they joined the fight in Syria against the West.
The American military is opposed to what ISIS is up to, but hasn’t been able to stop the funding that is flowing through America. To try to kill these rumors, the Obama administration has supported military attacks in Iraq, but have avoided the issue of Syria entirely.
It is shameful to learn America’s leaders are involved in supporting the most oppressive regime in recent history. ISIS wants to destroy the West and Christianity, while murdering all non-believers. In Pakistan, Christians have already been slaughtered as ISIS fights to instill a Sharia regime. ISIS should be DESTROYED, not funded by tax dollars:
The Obama administration funding ISIS should not surprise us. Lets not forget that the Obama administration has refused to back Egypt in its destruction of ISIS, and is working with Turkey which [is] one of the main backers of ISIS. Let us also not forget that the USA supports the FSA and is working to continue to fund and train jihadists in Syria to overthrow the Assad regimen, an action that will only allow the Islamists, and ultimately Turkey, to dominate the Middle East.
Inga kommentarer :
Skicka en kommentar
Tack för kommentar - jag godkänner när jag har läst den! Om den är värd att godkännas :)
Health care reforms are turning into health care revolts. Americans are turning up the heat on congressmen in town hall meetings across the U.S.
While watching these political hot August nights, I decided to research the reasons so many are opposed to Obamacare to separate the facts from the fantasy. What I discovered is that there are indeed dirty little secrets buried deep within the 1,000-plus page health care bill.
Dirty secret No. 1 in Obamacare is about the government’s coming into homes and usurping parental rights over child care and development.
It’s outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading “home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children.” The programs (provided via grants to states) would educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills.
The bill says that the government agents, “well-trained and competent staff,” would “provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains … modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices,” and “skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development.”
Are you kidding me?! With whose parental principles and values? Their own? Certain experts’? From what field and theory of childhood development? As if there are one-size-fits-all parenting techniques! Do we really believe they would contextualize and personalize every form of parenting in their education, or would they merely universally indoctrinate with their own?
Are we to assume the state’s mediators would understand every parent’s social or religious core values on parenting?
Or would they teach some secular-progressive and religiously neutered version of parental values and wisdom?
And if they were to consult and coach those who expect babies, would they ever decide circumstances to be not beneficial for the children and encourage abortions?
One government rebuttal is that this program would be “voluntary.” Is that right? Does that imply that this agency would just sit back passively until some parent needing parenting skills said, “I don’t think I’ll call my parents, priest or friends or read a plethora of books, but I’ll go down to the local government offices”? To the contrary, the bill points to specific targeted groups and problems, on Page 840: The state “shall identify and prioritize serving communities that are in high need of such services, especially communities with a high proportion of low-income families.”
Are we further to conclude by those words that low-income families know less about parenting? Are middle- and upper-class parents really better parents? Less neglectful of their children? Less needful of parental help and training? Is this “prioritized” training not a biased, discriminatory and even prejudicial stereotype and generalization that has no place in federal government, law or practice?
Bottom line: Is all this what you want or expect in a universal health care bill being rushed through Congress?
Do you want government agents coming into your home and telling you how to parent your children?
When did government health care turn into government child care?
Government needs less of a role in running our children’s lives and more of a role in supporting parents’ decisions for their children. Children belong to their parents, not the government. And the parents ought to have the right — and government support — to parent them without the fed’s mandates, education or intervention in our homes.
Kids are very important to my wife, Gena, and me. That’s why we’ve spent the past 17 years developing our nonprofit KICKSTART program in public schools in Texas. It builds up their self-esteem and teaches them respect and discipline. Of course, whether or not they participate in the program is their and their parents’ choice.
How contrary is Obamacare’s home intrusion and indoctrination family services, in which state agents prioritize houses to enter and enforce their universal values and principles upon the hearts and minds of families across America?
Government’s real motives and rationale are quite simple, though rarely, if ever, stated. If one wants to control the future ebbs and flows of a country, one must have command over future generations.
That is done by seizing parental and educational power, legislating preferred educational methods and materials, and limiting private educational options. It is so simple that any socialist can understand it. As Josef Stalin once stated, “Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.”
Before so-called universal health care turns into universal hell care, write or call your representative today and protest his voting Obamacare into law. Remind him that what is needed in Washington is a truly bipartisan group that is allowed an ample amount of time to work on a compromise health care law that wouldn’t raise taxes (for anyone), regulate personal medical choices, ration health care or restrict American citizens.
Day 235 Obama Administration September 11 , 2009 - History
President Obama har beslutat att ge sig ut på en talturné för att prata om ekonomin, som fortfarande inte kommit igång, trots hans ihärdiga arbete under drygt 4 år som president. Här rapporterar Chuck Todd från NBC om saken:
Se även tidigare inlägg:
Djupgående recensioner med anknytning till amerikansk politik.
International and USA child kidnapping and abuse
(MrPressRelease.com and OfficialWire)
We have a world wide problem that we would like you to be aware of, which affects all children and families of every age, race and faith. The problem is parental kidnapping (abduction) and alienation which is being completely ignored by the government and vested interest groups.
Parental Kidnapping (Abduction) has been in existence since I STARTED IN 1974. Grants for missing children are only for stranger abduction but not for parental child kidnapping. We do now have in place a grassroots civil rights movement to exploit the crisis, which is an opportunity to save children from abuse. Innocent parents are being thrown into jail based on false allegations and hearsay evidence.
Children are being kidnapped and held against their will and are being brainwashed. Children are suffering – being denied the right to see their other parent – and being taught to hate them. Both children and left behind parents are victims whilst the kidnappers are being protected by the State and denied their rights.
- The health care system is being drained because of the problem that arises from this abuse.
- This abuse is perpetual – abused children repeat this cycle of abuse. We need to end this – now.
- Parental abduction is the source of many social problems which manifest into painful human abuse.
- Suicide, mental illness, sexually abused, physically abused, murdered, alcoholics, drug addicted prostitutes. These issues affect both boys and girls – of all nationalities and social class.
- The United States is one of only two countries in the world that have not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Somalia—a country without an internationally-recognized government—is the other. (Ref : Amnesty International)
- The barriers are the lawyers that turn the parental kidnapping cases into custody cases which generate huge profits for them and bankrupt the parents. This is unacceptable.
- The parents resources, wages, house, cars go up in smoke and they end up in poverty.
- Children and parent’s human rights are taken away, never to see their children again.
The US Constitution – which all public officials pledge allegiance – enforces a fiduciary and legal responsibility to protect citizens. The abuse of children to generate profits has no place in a civilized and mature democracy like the United States – let alone in this world. We urge you to work with us to eradicate this cancer of abuse as it is damaging thousands of children and parents each week. It is patriotic and humanitarian as a human being to prevent all forms of abuse.
As a victim of stranger abduction and the parental abduction of my son I , Marianne Malky have spent over 34 years to expose and educate on this very issue. I have listened to over 2,000 cases. The voices of the children are being silenced. Our group of charities (list attached) has a common purpose – to reunite the abducted children with both parents. We cannot remain in denial while children are being abused. We need to lead where others remain in denial and fearful to expose this crime. We, the people, have a duty to expose and end this cycle of abuse. We like to meet you to enact solutions as this is an International crisis.
MEDIA / PRESS CONTACT
USA Contact : Marianne Malky ( Founder and President)
Toll Free: +1-800-28 HELPME (800-284-3576) |
Other Phone: +1-561-586-8515
email : [email protected] | For information: www.voiceforthechildren.com
Voice for the Children, Inc. (USA Charity)
411 Wilder St., West Palm Beach, FL 33405, United States